wongaBlog
21Jun/1010

Visiting humanist schools in Uganda

I'm going on an adventure next week. Somewhat unexpectedly, I'll be travelling to Uganda to photograph three humanist schools.

The education system is Uganda is very much a work in progress. The government implemented free primary education a decade ago, and so created a follow-on demand for fee-paying secondary schools - a demand often met by religious organisations, who promptly take the opportunity to indoctrinate (because kids in a country where 35% live below the poverty line really need to be loaded up with some sin). But for plenty even this kind of education is a dream - many parents can't afford school fees at all, or are forced to skip years while they save up.

To help with these problems, three humanist schools opened in the past few years. They offer scholarships to poorer children, while providing a balanced education. They're called humanist to differentiate themselves from the religious schools, but are what we'd call secular - they're neutral on the subject of religion, and teach open-minded critical thinking. Ugandan law requires they teach Christianity, but it's presented as one of many philosophies, including humanist ideas. And of course the students study for GCSE equivalent maths, English, science, etc..

Isaac Newton High SchoolThe schools have very little money, and are mainly supported by the Ugandan Humanist Schools Trust, who manage donations and fundraising from Humanist organisations worldwide. The schools are improving, but none have running water, and only one mains electricity (another has a petrol generator). New Humanist magazine has brilliantly taken a particular interest in the Mustard Seed school - portions of the proceeds from Robin Ince's Godless Concerts are donated - and as such it now has an intake of 160 students. But all the schools are very much in need of funds.

I'm hoping I can take some photos to help with this, and I leave next Tuesday. I emailed the Trust 10 days ago, asking if I could come along on a November trip, and was very kindly invited to come along to International Friendship Week. This was great, and more than I was hoping for, but gave me two weeks to get ready. It's been a bit manic, but I'm almost there.

I'm pretty nervous - I've never been outside of the first world before - but excited too. We'll be travelling to the three schools, and I'll be staying at Isaac Newton High for a week. I may help teach, if I can be of use, but otherwise I'll be hovering and learning how it all works.

This will also be my Major Project for my final year of uni. I wanted to do something useful, and this seemed entirely appropriate - I just hope I can produce something helpful. It will explicitly not an art project, though - any pictures will be used solely to help raise money and awareness for the schools.

11Jun/107

Photography Quiz

I helped run an end-of-year photo festival at uni last week, and we wanted to include a photography-based quiz. I couldn't find much online so I put one together from various bits and pieces, and I figured it was worth posting for passing Googlers looking for something similar. We had seven rounds of ten questions, which took about 90mins:

  1. Photography trivia - 1
  2. Name the photographer from the photo - 1
  3. General knowledge
  4. Name the brand / Spot the Photoshopping
  5. Current affairs
  6. Name the photographer from the photo - 2
  7. Photography trivia - 2

All the relevant sheets / presentations are below. It's a little UK/London-centric, and I haven't included current affairs or general knowledge. I've also highlighted a couple of questions that relate to the University of Westminster, so probably won't be much use.

  • PDF (including answers) is here. Word version here.
  • Powerpoint of all the photo rounds is here.
  • Separate powerpoint for the Photoshop-round answers is here.

and the questions are below the 'continue reading' link (I only mention this because it's my blog and I didn't spot it for a few minutes).

26May/100

Year 3: done

Done! 3 down, 1 to go.

My calendar arrived at midday (the parcel company website tracked the ETA down to the hour, which took most of the stress out of my day) and I headed down to London in plenty of time to get it all handed in.

Phew.

Right: summer. I need to start my dissertation reading before too long, but I think I'm allowed a couple of weeks off.

Tagged as: , No Comments
25May/101

Déjà vu

I spent Saturday running around Bourton-on-the-Water as part of a treasure hunt. We had to decipher codes, tear around a maze, run pieces of string around a model village, fish things out of a river, and badger some Morris Dancers. It was great.

On Monday I went to a Strobist seminar. I think I learnt more about photographic lighting in that one day than I have in 3yrs of university. It was great.

This morning I got up early to watch the LOST finale. It was...I don't know what I think yet. But it was thought-provoking.

All of these things I would like to write about, but I am trying desperately to finish my workbook in time for handing-in tomorrow, and barely have time to eat. I will hopefully write about them before I start to forget. Also I have one major worry that is clouding out everything else.

On deadline day last year I was sitting at home, desperately hoping UPS would arrive with my project, so I could rush into uni and hand it in. It arrived in time, but the experience was awful, and I swore blind, backwards and to the gods of Cobol that this would never happen to me again.

It is going to happen to me again.

Last year was my fault - I pushed the deadine as far as it would go. This time it's a bit bloody unlucky. My project is a calendar, created on lulu.com. The first draft was ordered on a Sunday night, then printed on the Monday, and it arrived on the Tuesday. The second draft was ordered on a Thursday, posted on Monday, and arrived on Tuesday. The final draft was ordered last Tuesday, and was only posted today, a week later. This is admittedly the upper bound of their possible delivery dates, but all my experiences before had suggested it would be faster than that. It's not so all-or-nothing catastrophic as last time, as if all else fails I can hand in the pretty-much-done second draft. Nevertheless, I cannot believe this has happened again.

Tagged as: , , , 1 Comment
28Apr/103

Photos can mean things: discuss in words of more than three syllables

I'm meant to be writing an essay about allegory in photography, and I'm having to bite my fingers. The title is 'How can the theory of allegory help us understand a photograph?', and there's plenty of existing writing on this topic. Unfortunately, when you've gone through all the epistemological hand-wringing, dubious metaphors - allegory requires words/an image, therefore is 'parasitic'1 - and ontological angst, you basically end up with Google Dictionary's definition: an allegory is a text, painting or photo that means something else, usually a broad concept or theme.

And it's really hard not to be accidentally sarcastic. I've explained what allegory is, coming to the above conclusion. I now need to link this explanation to something practical. And all I keep ending up with is:

So, armed with the knowledge that a photograph can mean something other than its literal representation...

Which sounds like I'm making fun. It's hard to get around, though.

  1. only in the same way that music is 'parasitic' on the speakers. Honestly, I never know what to think about these metaphors. Another popular one is that portrait photography is just like hypochondria, because both are obsessed with the body. I can almost vaguely see that there is kind of a parallel of sorts, but I don't know what else to say - that's one of a thousand properties of the two concepts, and the rest are pretty different. I just think 'so?'. People somehow do PhDs on these topics, though. []
Tagged as: , 3 Comments
4Mar/103

Dissertation approved

I pitched my dissertation idea this morning. I'd been worried about doing so as I'm planning to research empirical aesthetics - the scientific study of responses to art - and swinging this by my notoriously artsy tutors was risky. Thankfully I got a friendly guy who was fine with the concept, only making sure I wasn't planning to write something dull and technical. So that's quite the relief. The other tutor in the room wasn't impressed when I said criticisms of my topic as 'reductionist' weren't compelling, but otherwise I got through. Hoorah! I've been wanting to research this subject since the first year, and it would have been such a waste to instead write 10k words comparing conveniently unfalsifiable art theories.

Tagged as: , 3 Comments
13Feb/103

Antivenn

I may have mentioned that the theory side of my degree leaves something to be desired. Here's a diagram we were shown last week:

We were shown this in a lecture

They're not even trying any more, are they?

To be fair, Andrew pointed out that it all makes sense if you assume the 'being' and 'meaning' labels refer to the areas outside the opposite circle.

5Feb/102

Video results

My uni results came in this evening, and my video project did spectacularly badly. The video itself got 37%, which is quite the achievement - I don't know of anyone who's managed a lower score. The how-i-made-it documentation pulled the overall mark up to 40%, which is the lowest possible mark to still get a third.

They had two major problems with it: the lack of research, which I hold my hands up to, and the concept, which was 'inconceivable' and totally unrealistic. I don't want to whine, but it seems reasonable to mention this is from the teachers who, when I pitched a previous idea about a party political broadcast that focussed on under-appreciated issues, told me it would be better if I made up all the issues, as this would be surreal.

I don't know - maybe a non-realistic Childline theme was a tasteless thing to do. I knew it wasn't a completely believable situation, but I thought the metaphors were clear and had a strong enough message to justify the liberties. Maybe this is just wishful thinking.

They also said my technical skills were weak, which hurts. If there's one area I thought I was fine, it was the technical side.

So I'm a bit down about the whole thing. The low mark doesn't actually affect anything important, due to the weird averaging-out system of marking, but it's not nice being told that something you worked very hard at is rubbish. I'll get over it, though.

Other than that, my essay got 63%, which is my lowest essay score, but still a 2:1. I'm fine with that. The lecturer crossed out all the don'ts, can'ts, won'ts, etc. on the basis that contractions are 'not appropriate for an academic text'. This is the first I've heard of it - all my essays have used contractions - and I suspect I got a (ridiculously) old-fashioned dude. Who are these academics who can't understand contractions? Luck of the draw, I guess.

Tagged as: , , , 2 Comments
13Jan/102

Video: done

I handed in the video today, which is quite the weight off my mind. I spent most of Christmas worrying about it, one way and another, and while it didn't spoil things, it's still nice to nuke that nagging voice. The module was far harder than I anticipated - I thought it'd be fun, but producing three minutes of moving footage that doesn't seem too hacked-together was surprisingly stressful. Lighting is the main problem - with a photo you can just bounce a flash off a wall and it'll probably look ok; with video a similar effect is only possible with alert-the-fire-brigade lighting kit, which is a nightmare. It's revealing that the final result had none of my own video/audio (which may have been pushing my luck). I think I'll stick with photos for a while.

We then had a talk on upcoming projects, which threw us a large curve ball. Apparently, everything we do from now on counts towards our degree. Now, this was an odd thing to hear. We're in the middle of our third year, after all, and you'd think our work so far would be of some use. Not so much. The first year is completely ignored, and everything else - up to now - is combined to produce an overall 'Level 5' mark. Everything from now on is 'Level 6'. Our averaged Level 6 grade will be our final degree classification, but only if the Level 5 grade is within one classification. So: if I get a 2:1 for Level 6, my previous work has to average at least a 2:2 for the 2:1 to stand1. I'm pretty sure my Level 5 grade will be a 2:1. Which essentially gives me a blank slate: if I decide to really work for the next 16 months, I could get a first. Interesting.

Anyway, our next project is: do whatever you want. I can make a 90-minute feature film if I feel like it (I don't feel like it). I have to present a rough idea in 10 days time. Humm.

  1. to be fair, this information was probably written down somewhere, if we had but looked. []
Tagged as: 2 Comments
10Jan/102

24/7

The brief for last term's video module was 'a 3-5 minute video', and my attempt is below. It has to be handed in on Wednesday - could you possibly let me know if you spot anything amiss? I've seen it ~a bajillion times now, and data blindness has set in...

Tagged as: , 2 Comments