wongaBlog
13May/102

Self-service divinity

Juliet died in Such Tweet Sorrow this morning, so it's her fault I was late for the train. Reading her untimely-if-not-unexpected demise meant I had to run - run! - across approximately fifteen miles of car park to the ticket machine, then hurriedly punch through the usual sequence, only to have it supply a weird ticket. It gave me the cheap fare, which is only for trains due into London after 13:45 - mine would get in at 13:30. But the machine had always been clever enough to understand this before, and I didn't have time to argue, so I ran for the platform figuring the rules must have changed.

A few minutes later I'm on the Marylebone train, settling in, when Speaker Dude went bing-bong, welcomed me to Chiltern Railways, told me all the destinations, and informed me the cheap ticket wasn't valid. Great. Now I'd have to wait for The Man to come around, then explain that a mendacious ticket machine had been wilfully obstructive, and could I upgrade? And I probably couldn't upgrade, because I don't think that's possible, so I'd have to get off at Banbury and wait for the next train, which would mean I was late for the end-of-module critical assessment at uni, scuppering my year, degree and all chance of future happiness. Stupid ticket machine.

I saw The Man coming. I knew the end was near. I resigned myself to my fate. After all, the Tories are in power, Romeo and Juliet are dead - what's the point? And The Man was only five people from me by now. Then Speaker Dude went bing-bong.

Bing bong! This train is now going out of service. Please accept our apologies. A replacement train will be along shortly. Please get out at Banbury.

And The Man went away. And the replacement train took long enough to arrive that my ticket became valid. And this leads me to one inescapable conclusion:

The ticket machine is magic.

How did it know? Nobody knew. Speaker Dude didn't know. The Man didn't know. The train said Marylebone on the front. Magic.

Replacement Train then rushed to London, somehow arriving at 13:30. But the ticket was still valid, and I got to uni on time, had the crit, which it turned out wasn't so important after all, and my life is now back on track.

The evidence suggests I should worship the magic ticket machine. I will do so, and may buy it a hat.

29Mar/090

Ali Bongo’s Book of Magic

When I was six, my grandparents bought me Ali Bongo's Book of Magic. Here it is:

Ali Bongo's Book of Magic - 1

It's the best magic book for children I've seen - hell, it compares well to many adult versions. Most magic books are dry, technical affairs - lists of instructions and often-cringeworthy patter - but Ali Bongo's is a delight.

It starts off simply, with scientific 'tricks' requiring no skill, before moving onto close-up effects using household1 objects. Then there are simple tricks to impress friends at parties, and classic effects like the cups and balls. The setups get more elaborate as the book progresses, and I had great fun building trick boxes and cardboard scenes, while nagging my parents to buy me sponges, handkerchiefs, ribbons and pom-poms, as I appropriated half their kitchenalia.

All the magical secrets are said to come from 'Pongolia', a wonderfully-realised land somewhere between 'the Middle and the Far East, surrounded by a range of magnetic mountains', and stories of this far-off land litter the book. Similarly scattered are cartoon introductions to famous magicians:

Ali Bongo's Book of Magic - 2

(secrets blurred out, as Mr Bongo would have wanted) as well as guides to stagecraft, costume, patter, and generally putting a coherent act together:

Ali Bongo's Book of Magic - 3

That kid is totally me.

I performed everything in the book. If I knew any children interested in magic - and, now I come to think of it, I do - I'd buy this book for them without hesitation. I can't think of a better introduction.

Ali Bongo was a stage magician in the 50s and 60s, but is more famous for his behind-the-scenes work. He was advisor to the Paul Daniels Magic Show in the 80s, and the David Nixon show before that. He designed countless effects: his tricks were always amongst the most quirky and elegant in the Davenports catalogue, and I'm sure I bought plenty. I haven't been active in the magic world for nearly ten years, but Ali Bongo still turned up from time to time. He was the inspiration for Jonathan Creek, and last year became President of the Magic Circle.

Ali Bongo died a few weeks ago. I'd love to have met him. RIP Mr Bongo - you made a big difference to me.

  1. genuinely household too - other magic books have been known to push this definition somewhat []
Tagged as: , No Comments
7Jan/097

Improve your sex life with magic tricks

Here is a very useful video on using magic tricks to pick up women. If you can make it through two minutes without wanting to crawl into a bucket and die, you're better than me:

Worth it for the utterly baffling final three seconds, though.

Take it from an ex-teenage-magician: you will not impress women by performing magic tricks. At all. Ever. Every male magician tries to envisage situations where the opposite is true, but it never happens. The closest I ever heard anyone get was David Copperfield, when he was mugged a couple of years ago. In front of his two female assistants, he showed the mugger his 'empty' pockets, despite having a wallet and mobile phone in them. Not very heroic, but not bad. Except the mugger then robbed the assistants, which totally ruined it.

Via Graham Linehan's twitter account, via Jonathan Ross, who's been vetting celebrity tweeters for the last couple of days. Graham Linehan = real. Eddie Izzard, Jeremy Clarkson and Jack Dee, not so much. He's apparently going to try and talk Russell Brand into joining, which would be entertaining. I miss my weekly dose of Brand insanity.

8May/070

The Amazing Colour Changing Card Trick

Watch this all the way through, and see how your ego copes:

Via Bad Astronomy.

2May/07661

Derren Brown – Mind Reader: The Evening of Wonders

Derren Brown programme coverHalfway through the second act, Derren Brown called out my name and told me the first song I ever played on a guitar. It was quite the thing.

Derren Brown is a 'psychological illusionist' memorably described by Charlie Brooker as 'clearly the greatest dinner party guest in history'. His TV shows regularly feature a mixture of street magic/psychology and elaborate, often controversial, events. He's certainly the most interesting TV magician of recent years, and last night I saw him at the Birmingham Hippodrome.

Like his TV shows, the act was described as a mixture of 'magic, suggestion, psychology, misdirection and showmanship'1, and lived up to the billing. We were told that during the show a gorilla would come onto the stage, steal a banana from a stand at the front, and most of us wouldn't notice. So it proved. We saw an audience member forget information given to her moments before, a floating table drag four volunteers around the stage, six rapid-fire games of 20 questions in which he never asked more than 4, and a series of baffling three-digit-number predictions. Somebody's phone rang and he said "don't answer, it's really bad news".

Derren Brown is unquestionably on the side of Good. He says up front "I do not have psychic powers, and I may well trick you", then proceeds to do so. People who claim to have psychic powers and use the same tricks to make money are unquestionably Evil2, the opposite are great entertainment. Some have questioned whether he goes too far: there's plenty of genuine psychology, but also a fair amount of magical trickery wrapped up in the same patter. I was lucky enough to get an insight into this. At the end of the first act we were told to watch out for ushers with 150 cards. Recipients were asked to write a question for Derren on the card, seal it inside the supplied black envelope and note their initials and row on the front. They were then to check the envelope was truly opaque before walking onto the stage and placing it into a glass bowl, which remained in full view of the audience throughout the interval.

Obviously, I wanted to do this. So I did. I moved fairly quickly and was able to grab a card before they ran out. The card asked for my name, birthday and a question for Derren. He'd said it could be literally anything, so I wrote "How did the bee 'waggle dance' evolve?". The back of the card then asked for a private piece of information to further test his abilities, so I filled this in too then quickly headed to the stage, dropped my envelope into the bowl and made it back to my seat just before the lights dimmed.

After a couple of tricks he explained the procedure. By looking at the handwriting on the front of the envelope he hoped to ascertain the personality type of its owner. We were to stand up, and he'd then read our body language and try to figure out what we'd written. And then proceeded to do so. He picked out apparently random cards, sometimes using them, sometimes discarding them, and called out the initials so the owner stood. He told people the pets they had, the password for their computer, their occupation and what they'd been doing that day. About half-way through he took off his microphone earpiece, in case anybody thought he was being fed answers, and wrapped bandages around his head to completely blind himself. And then continued with the act. The following exchange (transcribed as accurately as I can remember) happened shortly after:

DB: [picks up a card] A guitar! Andy..Andrew...does that match anybody?
Me: [standing up and receiving the microphone from a scurrying usher] Yes, that's me.
DB: A Taurean, right?
Me: Yes. [gasps from audience]
DB: This is something musical, something to do with the guitar. I'm getting...It's the first song you played on the guitar, am I right?
Me: Yes.
DB: Ok. About fifteen years old, right?
Me: No.
DB: It is older?
Me: Oh, me or the song?
DB: Never mind, one question at a time. Sing the song over in your head. Over and over. Try to project it to me.
Me: [actually doing so]. Ok.
DB: I'm getting something about...pain, is that close?
Me: Yes, very.
DB: And lots of pain. I can't quite figure it out. There are many people in pain? Something like that?
Me: That's very close.
DB: I can't get the title I'm afraid, what is it?
Me: Everybody Hurts. [audience go into shock]

I was very, very impressed. The rest of the show was most entertaining, but I couldn't quite get over him managing to detect that kind of information from what must have purely been the tone of my voice - it's astonishing that people can give away that much information!

Later, I changed my mind. There's no doubt that the guy has an uncanny ability to read people, and I was prepared to accept that handwriting could give away very obvious facts like gender, leaving him to discern the rest from body language, but blinded he couldn't possibly have known my guitar fact and name. So it must have been trickery, rather than psychology. I'm confident I've worked out how it was done, starting from the age-old magical principle that there is no limit to the trouble a magician will go to. I'm not going to go into it here - I see no reason to, and am still bound by the old magician's code anyway - but the clues are there if you want the intellectual exercise.

It is momentarily crushing to realise you've been fooled. I bought into the psychological aspect, and when I realised this was a falsehood I felt tricked. But not for long. Once you figure out the secret you can see the myriad of ways he worked to throw people off the scent, and it was remarkably well done. The subtlety and panache of just that one trick was stunning, and his performance impeccable: I believed every second of him not being able to figure out the song title. There was plenty in the show that was clearly trickery, but I have no idea as to the mechanics. Other effects gave every impression of being purely psychological. I had the advantage of extra knowledge in the routine I was involved with, and if each of the others was as carefully constructed, which they must have been, it was a hell of a creation. My admiration far outweighs the initial resentment.

Derren Brown's obfuscation of psychology and trickery is edgier than most magicians', but I don't have a problem with it. You don't have to be a great logician to realise it's impossible to get a psychological reading of somebody's handwriting if you're blindfolded, and throughout the show he was at pains to say he doesn't believe in psychic ability and is highly skeptical with regard to the paranormal. I can't think of any statements that were outright lies and not magician's misdirection. There's plenty in psychology that is astonishing - much of it is well highlighted in his more spectacular TV work - and anything that draws attention to it is fine with me.

A good magic show is a wonderful thing, and there aren't many classier than this. Highly recommended.

  1. the programme is also "100% natural: we have used organic paper and done away with nasty chemicals or artificial inks." Gotta love those natural inks. []
  2. it's likely that some believe they have some genuine ability, but that's not an excuse []
25Jan/072

Spelling Bee?

In TV news:

The BBC is to launch a reality series which will follow a group of children learning magic at a Harry Potter-style boarding school.

It sounds like a good idea, except modelling it after the deathtrap that is Hogwarts may not be wise. I'm terribly biased, but I think magic is a wonderful skill to learn. It's great for building confidence, can be very satisfying, and has an inherent link with critical thinking. However:

The Sorcerer's Apprentice, which will air later this year, will show the children learning card tricks, Latin spells and illusions.

Latin spells? Like transubstantiation? Ick.

18Jun/062

Rapid weight loss

One of those magic tricks that's just too amazing. There's only one explanation, and it ends up as a gag rather than a proper trick, but is still funny as hell:

17Jun/069

I am not ashamed

Somebody called Mark left this comment on the below post about Doctor Who:

You are of course free to post about Doctor Who on your own blog.
However, my concern as with lots of otherposts on blogs listed on “bloggers for Labour” is the impression this gives to passing possible Labour voters and how it makes us look to our opponents.
At present it makes us look like sad geeks, our opponents must be pissing themselves.

I was unaware that passing possible Labour voters, as well as opponents, still think in moronic playground cliché.

When I was seven or so, somebody bought me The Ali Bongo Book of Magic. It was full of easy magic tricks using everyday objects. I loved it. Magic became my main interest. I'd practice card tricks and card sleights until I had them perfect. I discovered Davenports magic shop in London, and spent most of my spare money picking up wonderful little illusions. In hindsight, I wasn't bad. I performed annual shows at my secondary school. I won awards at the borough talent show. I was on stage at the Midlands Arts Centre. I won the British Magical Society's Young Magician of the Year award (not as prestigious as it sounds, but not bad), and performed for the BMS senior section. I really enjoyed being on stage and delighted in entertaining. Then, I hit puberty.

There'd always been people who made fun. That's what happens at school. For a good number of years it didn't bother me, but once puberty kicked in I began to care what people thought. I realised that people weren't poking good natured fun, they were genuinely being spiteful. For anybody who said they liked the magic, there'd be two popular jocks who'd hurl insults as all their friends laughed. I began to take it to heart. It didn't matter what anybody else said - these were the people everybody liked, the cool crowd, and they hated me.

It happened very slowly, such that I didn't really notice it, but I began to associate the magic with being 'sad', or 'pathetic'. I stopped caring about it so much. I think my parents realised what was going on, but peer pressure is almost impossible to fight. My school magic shows in years 7 and 8 (when I was 13 and 14) were, in hindsight, pretty good. But years 9 and 10 were dodgy. I hadn't put in the practice. On the final day of school I cut my least favourite teacher's head off with a guillotine, and I entirely relied upon the illusion - the surrounding act wasn't up to much. I remember hearing the abuse as I carried the guillotine across the playground after the show, and thinking that it just wasn't worth it. After secondary school I dropped out of my fortnightly magic club, and never really took it up again.

It was odd. All through school I wanted to keep doing the magic, as I enjoyed it, but I became ashamed of myself for doing so. Even now when I pick up a pack of cards there's a behind-sense of shame, that people will justifiably laugh at me, that I'm a bad example of how to be.

Sad geeks? For liking Doctor Who? Screw you. It's seven years since I left school and I can see this attitude for what it is. The implication is that normal, intelligent people do not like Doctor Who, nor anything else that may be 'geeky'. I should rid myself of my likes and dislikes and conform to some dreary grey gob of nothingness. But it's not normal, intelligent people who think this. It's people too brainless to see beyond their own perspective, or who are so afraid they might be missing something that they resort to I'm-more-popular-than-you insults. I let people rip the joy from being a magician, but now I'm older, wiser and stronger. I'm not going to pander to this miserable short-sighted crap, whether it's from passing Labour voters, opposition readers, or Guardian columnists - and I strongly suspect that most of these people do not, in fact, think in the way suggested. You think my liking Doctor Who gives the Labour party a bad name? I think it's that kind of attitude that belittles politics in general.

I like Superman, Star Trek, Doctor Who and Firefly. I like sci-fi novels, comics and fantasy. I like toys. I like cartoons and superheroics. I like computers, technology and science. If you think these are unworthy and something that should be mocked, the problem lies with you. Anybody who uses 'geek' as a term of abuse demonstrates their lack of thought. I revel in my geekery, and good-natured ribbing is fun, but cross the line and you reveal your own ignorance. To call such an attitude childish is an insult to children. It's just stupid.

Perhaps Mark was genuinely trying to offer advice, but the last sentence sounds spiteful, to me. You want to criticise me for my political opinions? Go ahead. Want to argue religion? Fine. But attacking me for taking pleasure in that which I enjoy is pathetic.