The Telegraph’s oh-so-shocking David Miliband story
The Telegraph are happily reporting that David Miliband, an atheist, sends his son to a faith school. He 'has been accused of hypocrisy', we're told in the most passive of passive voices. It's not the Telegraph accusing him of hypocrisy, in their website-front-page top-section headline; oh no: it's other people. And what a terrible hypocrisy it is. It means...wait, what does it mean?
As ever with this type of story, it doesn't mean much. 99% of hypocrisy stories are dickish, because they don't go beyond risk-free attack. When newspapers accuse someone of inconsistency, they're not making any statement on the rights or wrongs of the positions, so there's no comeback. Media pure-hypocrisy stories conjure up an air of vague wrongness, without ever honing in on a specific problem. What is the Telegraph trying to say, here? That hypocrisy is a binary personality trait, and David Miliband can't be trusted on anything, ever? That there's something wrong with faith schools? What? It's meaningless.
Everyone's a hypocrite. Everyone fails to meet their ideals, and everyone has to compromise sometimes. Government ministers more than the rest of us. I suppose continuous, spectacular hypocrisy could eventually become a point unto itself, but most of the time you have to go beyond the inconsistency. You can use hypocrisy as the starting point - the minister says x, but does y, because the problem with x is... - but isolated it's just trolling. If you want to be completely ridiculous you point out inconsistencies across the entire government, as if such a massive organisation could avoid such problems. This is all Private Eye does, as far as I can tell. Such things only feed cynicism, and stifle useful argument.
And, aside from that, mentioning a minister's children is pushing it. There could be all sorts of reasons for the choice of school, none of which need bringing up in a newspaper. Anyway, the Telegraph eventually finds someone who'll say the word 'hypocrisy', albeit more gently than you'd imagine from the headline. But they don't have much luck elsewhere:
The British Humanist Association, which wants to remove the right of faith schools to discriminate on the basis of religion, said Mr Miliband’s choice of school was a private matter.
This is why I like the BHA: they're classy.
It’s like rain
Last week William Hague took the lead in PMQs, and said:
Isn't there something supremely ironic about being lectured about food waste by a prime minister who is past his own sell-by date?
Which is quite supremely stupid. That's not ironic, that's just arsing about with words. Isn't there something supremely ironic about being told to clean up your act by someone who was washed up long ago? Isn't there something supremely ironic about being lectured on food dialogues by a has-bean? See: stupid. Just a worthless ad hominem.
Obviously it's meant to sound like the PM is being hypocritical, which isn't surprising given 'you're a hypocrite' is apparently the only technique taught at politician school1. Harriet Harman didn't do much better, with some comment about not getting dietary advice from someone who used to drink a lot. Or something. I stopped caring.
Anyway, this reminded me of B4L's recent post about Labour reactions to David Davis, which makes the rare valid point about hypocrisy (a point completely ignored by the crazies in the comments). Also worth seeing are the 10 Socialist Commandments. It's an oasis of sanity, that site.
- sorry, bitter today [↩]
