Geotagged holiday photos
Ten days after getting back, I've finally finished processing and uploading our Lake District holiday photos to Flickr: the set's here if you're interested. I think Flickr's Map view is cool:
Built-in GPS is one of the few features I'd consider upgrading my camera for - geotagging by hand in Flickr (or Google Earth via Trippermap) is time-consuming and sometimes tedious, but I do like looking at the results.
Geotagging for Flickr using Picasa and Google Earth
Flickr's new geotagging tools are fun. Apparently they've had over 1.5 million photos added to maps since they launched the service at the weekend, which is quite impressive! I geotagged all the shots from my March trip to New York, and it's cool to look at the resulting map then turn off the filter so that everyone's photos are visible. You can see similar shots at all different times of the year, which works particularly well in Central Park.
While trawling around the forums I came across a good method for geotagging photos before uploading. If you use Flickr to store your photos online, Picasa to organise them and would like to geotag them easily, there's coolness afoot:
- Pick up the new beta version of Picasa from here (you'll need a Google Account, I think) and the Google Earth 4 beta from here.
- While they're downloading, make sure you're logged into Flickr and go here and confirm you want EXIF data imported automatically.
- Using the new Picasa, select a bunch of photos that you want to locate, then go to the 'Tools' menu and select 'Geotag' -> 'Geotag with Google Earth'
- GE will then open, and you can use the full power of its search capabilities to find the correct location. Hover the crosshair over the appropriate area and click 'Geotag', and repeat for each picture in GE's window before hitting 'Done'.
- The latitude and longitude data have now been added to the actual JPEG file and are combined with the existing EXIF data. Send the pics to Flickr in the normal way (I tend to email them from Picasa, or if there are a load I'll export them and use a bulk uploader). Flickr will automatically recognise the mapping data and add the images to its geotagging database.
I only found out about the Flickr's EXIF Import option from a post in their forum - it doesn't seem to be accessible from the standard Account options screen as yet.
Obviously this doesn't work for photos already uploaded, although it'd theoretically be possible to 'replace' each one with a mapped-up copy. I've been using the localize bookmarklet, which works well but is far slower than the built-in interface would be. However, Flickr today released their mapping APIs and have explicity stated that people can build applications using other providers' maps, so hopefully there'll be a decent equivalent within a week or two.
Flickr’s geotagging is let down by Yahoo Maps
Just back and looking at Flickr's new geotagging tools, which allow you to specify the location your photos were taken. They're very cool, in theory. Groups / sets / search terms / individual users' photos can be viewed in a very swish interface - mine are here, for example - and there are plenty of searching options that seem most impressive. Full details are here. It's all great and very well done, but they're badly let down by the underlying map software: Yahoo Maps. It just sucks, especially when you compare it to the greatness that is Google Maps. I know it's early days, but adding a location just now was nearly impossible.
I tried to add a location to the photos from the Bloggers4Labour meetup last Thursday. The postcode was EC4M 9EH. Type this into Google Maps and you get:
The location marker shows the actual postcode location, and there are street names and other details. Great. Do the same in Yahoo Maps, via the 'Organize!' Flickr interface, and you get:
Which is just the Eastenders credits. The small blue circle is a preexisting image I'd eventually tagged from satellite imagery (it was taken on a bridge which was thankfully easy to spot). The postcode I want is actually centered in the view, although that isn't mentioned. Zooming in to full detail gives:
Which is probably right, but I've no idea which building it is. I can't even figure it out from street names, since they seem to have no data for central London.
I just tried tagging a photo from this weekend's festival and had a similar problem. Yahoo just shows me a large area, whereas Google shows me a map of the locality that's actually useful.
Maybe these are just teething problems, and Yahoo Maps will probably improve over time, but it's a disappointment currently. The drag and drop interface is a great idea, but I hope somebody writes a greasemonkey script to change it to Google Maps. From what I've seen of the UK data it's not really useable atm.




