wongaBlog
6Sep/081

View satellites in Google Earth

A new Google Earth plugin lets you view all the orbiting satellites currently tracked by the US military. Doesn't sound very exciting, right? It's more interesting than you'd think - mainly because the sheer number is almost unbelievable. It's like a Cylon armada. Clicking on them displays their use and status, and lots are inactive. You can track their orbits, too. If nothing appears, it's geostationary1, but most have far more complex tracks than you'd think - particularly those further out. Astronomy Cast explaned the reasons behind the strange paths in 'Getting around the solar system', although I've apparently forgotten most of it already (I hate that).

  1. apart from the Ryman satellite, which is geostationery []
4Jul/080

Everywhere

Water-ice on Mars is cool, but not new - anyone with a telescope can spot the seasonal ice caps. You know what's more exciting? Water on Mercury (well, in its atmosphere). Also volcanoes (not in the atmosphere). Via BA.

14May/081

Not once Kirk gets there, they won’t

I've been itching to know the Vatican's thoughts on extraterrestrial life. Good news!

Writing in the Vatican newspaper, the astronomer, Father Gabriel Funes, said intelligent beings created by God could exist in outer space.

They know this from all the astronomy mentioned in the Bible, as well as their extensive questioning of astronomers.

Just as there are multiple forms of life on earth, so there could exist intelligent beings in outer space created by God.

...well, no. That's a bit circular, really. The Times has the exact quote:

Father Funes said that just as there existed a "multiplicity of creatures on Earth", so there could exist "other beings created by God, including intelligent ones. We cannot place limits on God's creative freedom."

Immovable objects; irresistible forces. Just saying. Anyhow, we haven't got to my favourite bit yet.

And some aliens could even be free from original sin, he speculates.

Planets where they don't have fruit? Where God didn't take his eye off the ball? Where there isn't a power-hungry cult trying to control people's every thought? I lose my sense of humour when people start talking about original sin. It doesn't take more than a moment's thought to see original sin for what it really is, and those who preach it lose their right to be treated politely. Twisted, manipulative bastards.

I think it's a mistake for the Vatican to start looking to the stars. They should stick to vague historical claims that can't be proven one way or another. There's more wonder in astronomy than the world's religions combined, and space has the annoying habit of supplying fresh data. It'll only veer towards comprehensible, and the Vatican should know to stay away from comprehensible. Like Perry DeAngelis used to say: if you're going to believe in a God, you have to give him something to do.

21Apr/080

Dark matter detected in the lab?

I'm not really one for pubs, and I felt intimidated to the point of wanting to hide under a chair at a skeptical meetup on Saturday, but tonight's Skeptics in the Pub could be quite exciting. Phil Plait's the guest speaker, and he just posted news of something which might, just might, be a direct, laboratory detection of dark matter. Even if not, it's something new and unexplained. Coooooooool.

22Aug/070

Google Sky

Google today released an update to Google Earth which adds the night sky, complete with images of galaxies and nebulae, as well as planetary motion, wikipedia links and constellations. A cheezeball video on the GE website introduces the basics (update: much much much better video here). This sounded most exciting, so I downloaded the update.

It is, initially, underwhelming.

The positions of the objects base themselves around your location in Google Earth, so I set it to my address and hit the 'sky' button. I saw black, with lines and coloured dots. Not as beautiful as I was hoping. There is no artificial horizon, so you start essentially floating in the middle of a black sphere. A myriad of constellation lines and names takes up much of the screen. I guess some people are interested in arbitrary groups of stars; I'm not. Thankfully, they can be easily turned off in a Layer panel similar to Google Earth's.

Slightly disappointed, I played around with the layers. 'Planets in Motion' adds a slider, which when dragged shows the movement of the planets over the next three months. This was kinda fun. My search for Saturn failed, so I scrolled around manually until I spotted it, and zoomed in.

Google Sky screenshotAt which point: wow.

Once you start to zoom, GS downloads higher-resolution images in the same way as GE. And what images! Starry Night and other astronomy programs can map the stars, but don't use real photographs, and it makes a hell of a difference. I haven't tested it fully, but they seem to cover most, if not all, of the sky. The milky-way is a patchwork of glowing dust. The ring around Polaris is a bit weird, but everything else seems to be very high-quality. Hubble images are correctly located - check out the orion and horsehead nebulae (searching for stars / other objects seems to work better than planets). And you can keep zooming and zooming and zooming.

There is nothing like looking at images of billions and billions of stars. It's astonishing.

The red and blue dots represent interesting sights: the Messier objects are included, all with associated information, along with the 12000-object New General Catalog and Yale Bright Star catalog. Between them these pick out the most interesting items in the sky, and each click brings fresh wonder.

The only obvious omission is the artificial horizon. Perhaps they're concerned about competing with commercial products such as Starry Night. But Picasa is free and possibly the best image-manager out there, regardless of price, so this seems unlikely. Hopefully they'll add one later - being able to view an easy-to-understand map of the sky above your head would be wonderful.

Google's massive database means there's huge potential here. I want to zoom in on Mars and see the Spirit and Odyssey photos. I want to see moon craters, comets and the real-time position of the international space station. I want to be able to switch to infra-red.

Don't let the initial impressions put you off. Search for 'ultra deep field', and you'll see objects which were exposed at the rate of one photon per minute. This is light from over 13 billion years ago, when the universe had barely begun. This is an amazing thing to release for free, and worth spending time with.

Update: From the discussion forum:

We had the horizon in during beta testing and the testers recommended
removing it because it was very confusing. Instead, you go somewhere
on Earth and then click SKY and see what is overhead.

We could consider bringing the horizon back, but it was confusing.

We really want Sky and Earth integrated....someday

The ecliptic could be added. We will think about it!

That's a shame...Hopefully enough people are complaining about it that it'll be back. The same post pointed out that CTRL-L will display the sphere's grid, which makes the view a little more comprehensible, but is unfortunately bright red...

17Aug/070

Astronomy Cast on Mercury

I recently started listening to the Astronomy Cast podcast1. It does a marvellous job of explaining the crazy universal physics I enjoy letting blow my mind. Dark matter, dark energy, relativity, spaghettification, black holes, the (endlessly fascinating) cosmic microwave background...it's all wonderful stuff.

But it's not all far-out frontiers of science. Sometimes it's a little more local. I recently learnt that geysers regularly explode out of Enceladus, one of Saturn's moons. The water is flung out into the vacuum, where it instantly crystallises and over time has formed a ring. Isn't that a beautiful image?

The title of the most recent episode was 'Mercury'. I was happy to listen while driving home from dancing, but didn't anticipate anything special. I figured I knew the most interesting Mercury facts: it's hard to see as it doesn't get far from the sun, it was a good test of general relativity versus Newtonian gravity, something about a magnetic field...Otherwise, reasonably uninteresting, as planets go.

Despite years of ingesting popular science, it apparently hasn't yet sunk in that a) I know nothing and b) everything is interesting. Mercury, unsurprisingly, is very cool:

  • Ice. Radio telescopes suggest there *might* be (water-)ice in the pole craters, which lie permanently in shadow. Ice! Probably from comets.
  • It's made of iron, and extremely dense. The most dense object in the solar system, in fact. This presents a problem - how did this happen? Probably it's the iron core of a once larger planet, in which case, what happened to the rest? Did something slam into it? Did a young sun blast its surface away?
  • Venus is hotter than Mercury, due to the former's runaway greenhouse effect.
  • At times when Mercury is visible, we always see the same face. For decades it was assumed that the planet is tidally locked - it rotates once per orbit, like the moon to the Earth, only ever showing the same face to the sun. Radio telescopes showed this isn't true: the back of the planet is incredibly hot, which shouldn't be the case. It turns out that because Mercury's orbit is particularly elliptical it's become locked into a pattern of 3 rotations per 2 orbits.
  • It has a magnetic field. Weird. Magnetic fields are caused by molten cores. Mars used to have a molten core and magnetic field, but cooled. Theory suggests that, despite its proximity to the sun, Mercury should have cooled similarly. Why hasn't it? Current theories suggest that the aforementioned weird orbit pulls and pushes on the planet in such a way that its core remains molten.
  • The far side of Mercury is mysterious. It's incredibly difficult to observe, but tentative low-resolution imagery has hints of a massive crater and mountain. Did Mercury get hit by something enormous enough to seriously deform its iron structure? NASA's Messenger spacecraft, en-route and scheduled for arrival in 2011, should provide answers.

There's plenty more in the show.

It's quickly become one of my must-listen podcasts, and is never less than fascinating. Large amounts of kudos and thanks to Fraser Cain and Dr. Pamela Gay for the hard work they put in - it must take some serious weekly research.

  1. sometimes only half of it, as my iPod is dying. Sob. []
24May/070

Three-and-a-bit Interesting Thursday Things

Via BA, a scale image of all known planetary bodies with a diameter of over 200 miles. It's fascinating. I knew there were moons larger than Mercury, but Ganymede's not all that much smaller than Mars. I'd be annoyed if I were that big and still called a moon.

In 1986, in a remote area of Cameroon, 1800 people in a circle of 12-mile radius abruptly fell over and died. Scientists investigated, and after a year's research realised measures were needed to prevent it happening again. Neatorama has the full story.

And, why eBooks are better than, er, Books, when it comes to bathtime. Read the various bookshop blogs and you'd think eBooks were the worst idea since marmite, but I'm happy to discover there are blogs who think otherwise. Andrew Marr, too. Booksquare - it of the wonderful header illustration - thinks the iPhone might be a major step forward...

9Jan/070

Comet McNaught

Comet McNaught should be visible for the next few days. It's pretty close to the sun and so can only be spotted near the horizon at twilight and just before dawn, but has apparently brightened unexpectedly and is relatively easy to spot. I don't know how easy it'll be to find an unobstructed (not to mention cloudless) view of the western horizon but I might give it a go - naked-eye comets don't come along very often. How to spot it: evening chart/morning chart (based on an observation point 15 degrees of latitude lower than the UK, which I think means it'll be higher in the sky here), or a more general overview here.

5Jan/070

Meteors from an extinct constellation

A friend sent me the link to this video of a spectacular 'meteor shower' over Colorado yesterday. It's thought to actually be a Russian booster burning up in the atmosphere, but is nevertheless quite the sight. The news anchors, however, describe it as "meteors from an extinct constellation". Meteors from an extinct constellation!? Meteor showers are caused by the Earth passing through clouds of tiny particles left behind by passing comets, and certainly have nothing to do with constellations. I can't even imagine what they're trying to say, and it seemed completely bizarre until a commenter at Bad Astronomy found this page. The actual meteor shower happening that night was the Quadrantids, and according to that Spaceweather site:

Quadrantid meteors take their name from an obsolete constellation, Quadrans Muralis, found in early 19th-century star atlases between Draco, Hercules, and Bootes. It was removed, along with a few other constellations, from crowded sky maps in 1922 when the International Astronomical Union adopted the modern list of 88 officially-recognized constellations. The Quadrantids, which were "re-zoned" to Bootes after Quadrans Muralis disappeared, kept their name--possibly because another January shower was already widely-known to meteor watchers as the "Bootids."

The title of the page is 'Meteors from an Extinct Constellation", and it's currently 6th in Google results for 'Quadrantids', which seems to explain everything. Still, you'd think somebody would have realised that out of context the phrase makes no sense at all. Wait, it's a Fox News affiliate, you say?

2Jan/070

A Warm Home

Back to the non-Christmassy theme, then. Looks boring, doesn't it? I'll have to try and spice it up a little.

I'm back at home now after nine days at my parents' house. It occurred to me in the middle of last week that nobody has any contact details for me, so the flat could have been hit by a custard ICBM and I'd have been clueless. Given that something has gone wrong the last few times I've been away I was a little nervous about returning, and when I opened the door to hear voices I was somewhat startled. Thankfully I can pretty much survey the entire flat from the front door, so I confirmed I was alone before the automatic ninja defence moves kicked in. A power cut had turned on the freeview box and speakers, so goodness knows how long they'd been chatting away to themselves. I later discovered that the main radiator's thermometer has devolved to the binary settings of 'hotter than the sun' or 'off'. It took me a while to realise as I was cooking and tidying up, and the flat was rather warm for a while.

My head's still spinning from the heat of said radiator and I'm concerned I'm not making sense, so here are a few posts I've enjoyed recently:

  • Bad Astronomy on the real meaning of 'day' and 'year' - I didn't know about 'tropical years'.
  • Tom Hamilton on the Daily Mail and the BNP.
  • The Partially Clips webcomic, via Pootergeek.
  • A discussion of what constitutes the Worst Argument Ever, which inevitably quotes Intelligent Design advocates, including the brain-busting:

    Secondly, even if your thesis were accurate at least it is verifiable. When one dies, he returns to dirt. I have yet to hear of one dieing and returning to a monkey.

  • Via Mur (who now has a posse), The Evil Monkey Guide to Creative Writing:

    For all of these reasons and more, writing is perilous work. It is more deadly than special ops. It is more boring than selling insurance. It is more exhilarating than jumping out of an airplane without a parachute. You may die from writing, but more probably you will be disappointed. That is okay, too. Disappointment, as we all know, builds character.

Right. Washing up or Torchwood? Torchwood, obviously. Oh, all right then.