<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: See if you can spot where the logic goes wrong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wongablog.co.uk/2009/11/21/see-if-you-can-spot-where-the-logic-goes-wrong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wongablog.co.uk/2009/11/21/see-if-you-can-spot-where-the-logic-goes-wrong/</link>
	<description>like balloons, but with dancing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:22:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://wongablog.co.uk/2009/11/21/see-if-you-can-spot-where-the-logic-goes-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-58334</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wongablog.co.uk/?p=4598#comment-58334</guid>
		<description>I feel sort of sorry for the newspapers when something like this happens. It looks almost exactly like a hypocrite being caught in a hilarious gaffe. That angle doesn&#039;t exist, obviously, but it&#039;d be a great story if it did, so they end up milking the superficial appearance of a scandal for all it&#039;s worth while carefully avoiding saying anything that might encourage further analysis. Then people like Gerald Coates give content-free soundbites to hook their interests into the whole thing.

The problem is that I can&#039;t for a second imagine a situation where a newspaper calls someone for a response quote and, having received it, say &#039;oh, you&#039;re right, this is a stupid story. I shall write about something else.&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel sort of sorry for the newspapers when something like this happens. It looks almost exactly like a hypocrite being caught in a hilarious gaffe. That angle doesn&#8217;t exist, obviously, but it&#8217;d be a great story if it did, so they end up milking the superficial appearance of a scandal for all it&#8217;s worth while carefully avoiding saying anything that might encourage further analysis. Then people like Gerald Coates give content-free soundbites to hook their interests into the whole thing.</p>
<p>The problem is that I can&#8217;t for a second imagine a situation where a newspaper calls someone for a response quote and, having received it, say &#8216;oh, you&#8217;re right, this is a stupid story. I shall write about something else.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
