Birmingham hates apostrophes
Birmingham looks to be doing an odd thing:
LONDON – On the streets of Birmingham, the queen's English is now the queens English.
England's second-largest city has decided to drop apostrophes from all its street signs, saying they're confusing and old-fashioned.
LONDON - here in the outskirts of Birmingham, I am a fan of apostrophes. They seem to be important in the communication of meaning: my sister's friend's investments, and all that. They don't seem 'old-fashioned' any more than words, or trees. What's the reasoning?
Councilor Martin Mullaney, who heads the city's transport scrutiny committee, said he decided to act after yet another interminable debate into whether "Kings Heath," a Birmingham suburb, should be rewritten with an apostrophe.
"I had to make a final decision on this," he said Friday. "We keep debating apostrophes in meetings and we have other things to do."
Mullaney hopes to stop public campaigns to restore the apostrophe that would tell passers-by that "Kings Heath" was once owned by the monarchy.
Not bad. I was not expecting that. I doubt it'll do anything to stop people who get worked up over such things as royal possessions, but if something so silly is wasting time at meetings, that's a definite point to you. Well done! Do go on.
"Apostrophes denote possessions that are no longer accurate, and are not needed," he said. "More importantly, they confuse people. If I want to go to a restaurant, I don't want to have an A-level (high school diploma) in English to find it."
I wish to refer the honorable councilor to a venerable institution I feel is appropriate in the circumstances.
I also feel I can help: the restaurant you're after has recognisable yellow arches.
Mullaney claimed apostrophes confuse GPS units, including those used by emergency services.
Righto. I once saw a policeman get distracted by a badger, so quite frankly sod badgers.
It's a good job you're only talking to the Associated Press! They only report dry facts - it's not like they're going to put any effort into debunking your story.
But Jenny Hodge, a spokeswoman for satellite navigation equipment manufacturer TomTom, said most users of their systems navigate through Britain's sometime confusing streets by entering a postal code rather than a street address.
She said that if someone preferred to use a street name — with or without an apostrophe — punctuation wouldn't be an issue. By the time the first few letters of the street were entered, a list of matching choices would pop up and the user would choose the destination.
A test by The Associated Press backed this up. In a search for London street St. Mary's Road, the name popped up before the apostrophe had to be entered.
There is no national body responsible for regulating place names in Britain. Its main mapping agency,Ordnance Survey, which provides data for emergency services, takes its information from local governmentsand each one is free to decide how it uses punctuation.
"If councils decide to add or drop an apostrophe to a place name, we just update our data," said Ordnance Survey spokesman Paul Beauchamp. "We've never heard of any confusion arising from their existence."
I'm going to take a moment now, then read that again. Ahhh.
It seems that Birmingham officials have been taking a hammer to grammar for years, quietly dropping apostrophes from street signs since the 1950s. Through the decades, residents have frequently launched spirited campaigns to restore the missing punctuation to signs denoting such places as "St. Pauls Square" or "Acocks Green."
LAST-MINUTE SAVE. I am now energised. I feel this is important. The other way, though: please, please, please rename it Acock's Green.
Revamped ‘shared links’ sidebar
Whenever I come across a website worth sharing I save it to my delicious account and tag it 'wongablog'. Anything with this tag appears in this blog's sidebar, just beneath the tweets (on the front page only). This works ok, but I've recently been using Google Reader's sharing options in a similar way, and I wanted to combine the two.
Google Reader lets you share posts with any gmail contact. So when I see an interesting post while browsing one of my way-too-many-feeds, I click 'share'. The post then appears in an 'Andrew's shared items' feed in the Reader account of anyone who wants to follow me. 'Share with note' lets me add editorials. I've been doing this more and more lately, and I wanted to add them to the blog somehow.
It was trickier than I thought, which just meant I got a bee in my bonnet. I needed some help, but got there in the end: the Shared Links now picks up links from both delicious and GR, and the latter's 'share with note' posts have my little editorials as a description.
I had to learn Yahoo Pipes to get it working. If you're interested, the method is after the break.
Twilight London, from above
The things you can do with a helicoper, some gyros, and the nous to come up with the idea.
Vista has no repair-install option
For the last couple of days I've been working on a broken laptop, which gets halfway into Vista before blue-screening. Usually this is a hard drive problem, but that checked out fine. So I analysed the logs for odd drivers, and nothing was amiss there either. Then I googled the BSOD error codes, which suggested Windows was fundamentally broken - my best guess is it lost power while installing SP1. Fine.
This kind of thing isn't a problem. I've had plenty of XP machines break in similar ways: the solution is to run a repair install from the XP disc. Repair installs are magic: they replace all the important system files, and usually fix everything outright. If not they almost always get you into the operating system, which is usually a good start.
Except, unbelievably, Vista doesn't do repair installs. I'd forgotten this. Apparently you can emulate the process by installing an upgrade over the top, but only from within Vista itself. Essentially, if Vista doesn't boot, you're screwed.
System Restore is unfortunately not working either, so I've had no choice but to run 'Restore to factory condition' - a process which formats the drive in its first step. I've backed up all the data elsewhere, and I'll have to restore it manually.
This is completely stupid. Maybe there are good reasons for removing the repair install, but I can't think of any, and it feels like an enormous step backwards.
Windows 7 is getting some good press, along the lines of 'Vista, but faster, sleeker, and without all the annoying crap'. I really hope so.
Christian Voice aren’t having a good week with the ASA
Having lost their complaint against the Atheist Buses, they've also been ordered not to readvertise a claim that the HPV vaccine is a cause of teenage infertility:
Assessment
Upheld
The ASA noted Christian Voice's response. We considered, however, that the claim "Every government initiative, including the HPV vaccine, will increase it [teenage infertility]" was a statement of fact that was a matter open to substantiation. We noted the webpage submitted by Christian Voice, but we did not consider that that webpage in itself was sufficient to support the claim. Because we had not seen robust, scientific evidence that the HPV vaccine caused infertility in teenagers, we concluded that the claim had not been substantiated and was misleading.
Bwaha. That's the thing about evidence-based claims - you need to understand the burden of proof.
Christian Voice head Stephen Green is an awful, awful man, and it's nice to see him taken down. In case you think I'm being overly unpleasant, here's his response to the bus adverts knockback:
But what do you expect when the ASA Council is appointed and run by a campaigning homosexual, Chris, Lord, Smith of Finsbury?
I am not making this up. The guy is worth attacking because he's continually called upon by the media to speak for the homophobic, medieval, vile-end-of-the-Christian-spectrum community. It would be nice if they'd take his ball away.
Caffeine baby cancer argh run aliens
Do you think someone's playing a trick on the Daily Mail? Because this reads like one big practical joke:
Women who drink coffee or tea during pregnancy may increase their baby’s odds of developing cancer, doctors believe.
Sounds bad. Details pls.
To establish the link, scientists at Leicester University will scrutinise the caffeine intake of hundreds of pregnant women and compare the results with blood samples from their babies after birth.
Wait. What? To establish the link? That's a bit backwards. Something's fishy.
‘Although there’s no evidence at all of a link between caffeine and cancer, we’re putting two and two together and saying: caffeine can induce these changes and it has been shown that these changes are elevated in leukaemia patients,’ added Dr Cooke.
I can't decide whether it's more likely the DM is being tricked, or some 'scientist' is actually silly enough to say such a sentence out loud, in front of people.
The Mail's headline on this story? "Coffee may raise child cancer risk: New evidence that caffeine could damage babies' DNA." Have I mentioned how much I despise the Daily Mail? Appropriate sarcasm can be found at The Daily Quail. Via NHB.
I have a new iPhone justification
In a pinch, you can use one to light a portrait. Come on.
The same link talks about a similar lighting setup in Collateral - a film involving a lot of driving around Los Angeles. Rather than spend a fortune setting up external lights in every location, they decided to just use the existing streetlights etc.. The problem is, streetlights / building lights aren't nearly as powerful as the usual film lighting equipment, so they had to use extremely sensitive film. This left the interiors of the cars almost black, however, and there's not a lot of room in a car for fancy lighting setups. So they stuck bright, flat-panel screens to the roof / other hidden parts of the car. Clever.
At some point in the last year I turned into a total lighting geek. I keep having to remind myself mid-conversation that not everyone finds it as interesting as me.
Return of Red Dwarf
w00t!
Cult comedy Red Dwarf is returning to TV, 21 years after its initial launch.
The show has been resurrected by digital channel Dave for a two-part Easter weekend special, which sees the cast finally return to Earth.
I used to love that show so much.
Tweeting Brand
Just FYI. Don't tell the Mail.
I enjoyed Jonathan's return to the BBC last weekend. There were immediate complaints about a crack on his radio show (that made me laugh), but - for what seems like the first time in ages - the BBC actually stood up for themselves. Hooray!
They seem to be doing that quite a bit this week, in slightly odd ways. I admit to being baffled by their refusal to screen a Gaza aid appeal on the grounds of impartiality. But - as with anything related to Israel / Palestine - I have no idea what I'm talking about, so I won't.
New term, new projects
We were given the new uni modules yesterday. They look like hard work, but - happily - very interesting.
The new theory module seems far better than last term's look-how-much-we-failed-our-critical-thinking-a-level shenanigans. It all about the context of photography: how it's displayed in exhibitions, books and on the Internet, and how this relates to interpretations. The structure is pretty different too, as the lectures will mainly be from curators, photographers etc., and it's up to us to research in advance and ask them questions. The onus is on me to work independently, and I much prefer this to the previous parroty system.
Our practical module (well, one of them) is on documentary photography. Our brief is pretty much that: produce some documetary photos. The topic is entirely up to me, as is the format and presentation. Pretty broad. I am thinking this might be a good chance to apply my resolution...
We had an odd discussion yesterday on the meaning of 'documentary'. People came out with widely differing interpretations, and our teacher summed it up by saying everybody has their own ideas about its meaning. I asked whether the word 'documentary' was therefore actually useful - if it's so broad as to accept almost mutually-exclusive ideas, does it mean anything? As so often happens with the word 'art', it seems bizarre to me to start with the word and try to decide what it means. Surely you should start from concepts, then apply words to them?
But I think this is a much broader question, and such queries can apply to lots of language. I suspect there's plenty of interesting philosophy there, and I should probably learn more about it before expounding too many theories
I think Wittgenstein and Russell wrote interesting things on the meaning of words, didn't they? Something to do with the word 'bachelor' having an explicit meaning, unlike most vocabulary. I'll have to look that up properly.
Anyway - lots of work to be done before May. I must be Properly Organised, or All Shall Be Lost. I shall attempt not to drop off the face of the internet in the process.
