<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Little Brother</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wongablog.co.uk/2008/08/13/little-brother/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wongablog.co.uk/2008/08/13/little-brother/</link>
	<description>like balloons, but with dancing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 01:29:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sara</title>
		<link>http://wongablog.co.uk/2008/08/13/little-brother/comment-page-1/#comment-5201</link>
		<dc:creator>sara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 07:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wongablog.co.uk/?p=3173#comment-5201</guid>
		<description>Interesting analysis of the book!  Did you not feel that the ending mitigated the government=evil thing at all?  I had some of the same feelings that you did, but I felt somewhat better that in the end the CA gov&#039;t stood up for him, closed the prison, etc. and that the end solution that seemed acceptable to all was civil trials rather than anarchy/just letting everyone go.  (Of course, the gov&#039;t doesn&#039;t come out perfectly here, with the release of the torturer woman, but it&#039;s definitely not portrayed as 100% evil either, at least in my opinion).

I was actually more taken aback by the first epilogue, in which the writer was basically telling kids to go out and fuck up security systems (how would you get a weapon on a plane?) and sort of sings the praises of phishers and other internet criminals (hello, just because it&#039;s online doesn&#039;t make it edgy and non-illegal!--then again, I am 25 so perhaps should not be trusted...).  I&#039;m not a huge fan of airport security either, but I personally think it goes a little far and makes the whole book seem a little less sympathetic.  But overall, I did really like it and I agree that it really made me think about things!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting analysis of the book!  Did you not feel that the ending mitigated the government=evil thing at all?  I had some of the same feelings that you did, but I felt somewhat better that in the end the CA gov&#8217;t stood up for him, closed the prison, etc. and that the end solution that seemed acceptable to all was civil trials rather than anarchy/just letting everyone go.  (Of course, the gov&#8217;t doesn&#8217;t come out perfectly here, with the release of the torturer woman, but it&#8217;s definitely not portrayed as 100% evil either, at least in my opinion).</p>
<p>I was actually more taken aback by the first epilogue, in which the writer was basically telling kids to go out and fuck up security systems (how would you get a weapon on a plane?) and sort of sings the praises of phishers and other internet criminals (hello, just because it&#8217;s online doesn&#8217;t make it edgy and non-illegal!&#8211;then again, I am 25 so perhaps should not be trusted&#8230;).  I&#8217;m not a huge fan of airport security either, but I personally think it goes a little far and makes the whole book seem a little less sympathetic.  But overall, I did really like it and I agree that it really made me think about things!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
