<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: eStarling wifi photo frame review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wongablog.co.uk/2008/06/27/estarling-wifi-photo-frame-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wongablog.co.uk/2008/06/27/estarling-wifi-photo-frame-review/</link>
	<description>like balloons, but with dancing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:22:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Koolajim</title>
		<link>http://wongablog.co.uk/2008/06/27/estarling-wifi-photo-frame-review/comment-page-1/#comment-5126</link>
		<dc:creator>Koolajim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 08:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wongablog.co.uk/?p=3038#comment-5126</guid>
		<description>Hey, good review. I have another make of photo frame and the clunky user interface and as you say 1980&#039;s slide-show has put me off.  It also has a tendency to hang/freeze.  So far I&#039;ve not found a decent review site for these frames that looks at the quality of the user experience as well as the technical aspects in a comparable way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, good review. I have another make of photo frame and the clunky user interface and as you say 1980&#8217;s slide-show has put me off.  It also has a tendency to hang/freeze.  So far I&#8217;ve not found a decent review site for these frames that looks at the quality of the user experience as well as the technical aspects in a comparable way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
