Royal priorities


April 20th, 2008 - 17:52 | add a comment

Plans are afoot to change the priorities of royal succession. Currently, if King William1 has a daughter, then a son, then falls off a horse, the son will become King because men = better. Some people think this needs to be changed, which seems reasonable. Having said that:

These are people who can arbitrarily pardon criminals, dismiss governments, command the army, and run out Established Christian church whose ministers get a free say in the running of the country on the basis that they were born into the right family, and you’re concerned that that might be sexist?!

Fair point.

  1. or whatever he decides to call himself - I suggest ‘Kong’ []

-----

No Responses to “Royal priorities” 

    • Any commenters will be rewarded with strawberries.

-----

Leave a Reply

Commenting Policy: Thoughts, observations, argument, debate and all other conversational wonderments are encouraged, but personal attacks or general trolling will result in your comment being deleted and your account/IP banned. If you're nice, however, you get strawberries.



(comments may take a few seconds to process due to anti-spam pixies)