<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photographing Lil and Tom&#8217;s wedding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wongablog.co.uk/2007/11/17/photographing-lil-and-toms-wedding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wongablog.co.uk/2007/11/17/photographing-lil-and-toms-wedding/</link>
	<description>like balloons, only with dancing</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 23:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://wongablog.co.uk/2007/11/17/photographing-lil-and-toms-wedding/#comment-9247</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 00:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wongablog.co.uk/2007/11/17/photographing-lil-and-toms-wedding/#comment-9247</guid>
		<description>You are not a doughnut in the slightest - we didn't need any other finer details :-) I think you did a great job!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are not a doughnut in the slightest - we didn&#8217;t need any other finer details <img src='http://wongablog.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> I think you did a great job!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lil</title>
		<link>http://wongablog.co.uk/2007/11/17/photographing-lil-and-toms-wedding/#comment-9084</link>
		<dc:creator>Lil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 21:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wongablog.co.uk/2007/11/17/photographing-lil-and-toms-wedding/#comment-9084</guid>
		<description>We are so utterly indebted to you and Ben for taking up the challenge and doing such a fantastic job! I'm glad you learnt things from the experience (we didn't even notice "the kiss" photo was missing), and I'm sorry as I could certainly have helped more with you planning it - but that goes for everything I was involved in with wedding planning =P I was so relieved to have the fundementals sorted (registrar, ceremony venue, reception venue, guests invited for the right day) that that I completely failed to plan the finer details! I fully accept that I am a doughnut =)

As I'm sure we'll keep saying... Thank you SO much =D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are so utterly indebted to you and Ben for taking up the challenge and doing such a fantastic job! I&#8217;m glad you learnt things from the experience (we didn&#8217;t even notice &#8220;the kiss&#8221; photo was missing), and I&#8217;m sorry as I could certainly have helped more with you planning it - but that goes for everything I was involved in with wedding planning =P I was so relieved to have the fundementals sorted (registrar, ceremony venue, reception venue, guests invited for the right day) that that I completely failed to plan the finer details! I fully accept that I am a doughnut =)</p>
<p>As I&#8217;m sure we&#8217;ll keep saying&#8230; Thank you SO much =D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://wongablog.co.uk/2007/11/17/photographing-lil-and-toms-wedding/#comment-8936</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 11:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wongablog.co.uk/2007/11/17/photographing-lil-and-toms-wedding/#comment-8936</guid>
		<description>Thanks, fixed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nod</title>
		<link>http://wongablog.co.uk/2007/11/17/photographing-lil-and-toms-wedding/#comment-8904</link>
		<dc:creator>Nod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 00:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wongablog.co.uk/2007/11/17/photographing-lil-and-toms-wedding/#comment-8904</guid>
		<description>"Most of the advice in this regard had said ‘quantity not quality, unless you want to spend weeks editing photos’. Given our amateur status we ignored this completely, and took as many as possible..."

"quantity not quality" should read "quality not quantity" right, or am I misreading this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Most of the advice in this regard had said ‘quantity not quality, unless you want to spend weeks editing photos’. Given our amateur status we ignored this completely, and took as many as possible&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;quantity not quality&#8221; should read &#8220;quality not quantity&#8221; right, or am I misreading this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
