Last night I saw the director’s cut of Donnie Darko. Bizarre. It’s one of my favourite films, but this added a chunk of religiosity and sci-fi exposition, and I think I prefer the more enigmatic original. The score was also different, and sometimes came close to overpowering the dialogue (on a small tv, anyway). Abi hadn’t seen it before and certainly enjoyed this telling, though, so maybe it doesn’t detract much from the film.
It’s unusual for me not to like a Director’s cut. Watching a film for the fifth time is a different experience from the first, and extra scenes that would have made an initial viewing tedious can be fascinating, especially if it’s a movie you love. I’ve liked the DCs of Armageddon, Gladiator and Superman. Blade Runner is another oft-quoted example, but I don’t think I’ve seen the non-DC version. I like the longer versions of the LOTR trilogy too, even if they do last forever. Sometimes DCs can be mental: The Abyss is a classic - the Director’s cut completely changes the story! And occasionally it goes the other way - the recent DVD DC of Star Trek: The Motion Picture is significantly shorter than the original.
-----


-----
YES!!! I’m so glad to know I’m not the only one who feels this way. I liked the movie much better when it was more like a Rorschach test. I was going through my DVD collection to get rid of duplicates awhile back, and I stupidly voted to keep the Donnie Darko director’s cut instead of the original. This was because I hadn’t actually watched the director’s cut yet, so I assumed it would be “better.” Now I’m kicking myself, because all of the decent “director’s cut” scenes are on the original DVD as extras anyhow. Gah!
I got the vanilla DVD of the original non-DC version (having missed getting the extras loaded version). But I am so glad to have that one and NOT the DC version. I love the original and just think it is so vividly superior to ther DC cut. With you all the way on your preference for its enigmatic stylings.