wongaBlog
31Oct/061

Happy Human Pumpkin

Happy Halloween!

Happy Human Pumpkin + Not-so-happy Chum

The logo on the left is the humanist Happy Human, whom I find endlessly endearing :-)

I'd never carved (or even really looked at) a pumpkin before, but given that they cost £1.50 each I figured it was worth a try. Plus the candles were 31p for 50, which confused me for a while. It's surprisingly easy to carve if you have a stencil. Chop off the top, scoop out the string and seeds, tape the stencil to the outside, poke around the pattern with a nail then cut through the indentations. They're now sitting on my windowsill freaking out small children and the elderly.

And, because I couldn't resist trying it...

Scary Faces

31Oct/062

Pinky and The Secularist

You know you're in for an entertaining read when the first sentence of an article is:

We are witnessing the rise of an arrogant secularist rhetoric founded on belief in the supremacy of reason and absolute faith in science and progress, dogmas which arouse ridicule in serious academic and intellectual circles nowadays.

Fun or what? Beware of logical explosions in the following paragraphs:

"Reason" itself, whose praises they sing night and day, is a perpetually changing mixture of many overlapping elements. It is neither abstract, nor intentional and does not confront the rich, labyrinthine human world as its other. It is quintessentially imbedded therein, in its emotions, languages, historical experiences, religious traditions and cultural heritage. There is no such thing as an ahistoric reason.

I don't think this makes any sense. Maybe it's been ghost-written by the Pope.

This means that we do not have one but many rationalities, the Christian European, the Islamic, the Chinese, the Indian to name a few, each stamped by the specific conditions of its evolution, and in turn incorporating a multitude of sub-rationalities. Neither do these traditions of rationality exist isolated from each other. They have much in common, the product of the interactive and communicative activity of cultures.

Aristotle's logos, Descartes' intellect and Kant's transcendental reason, are illusions, which no self-respecting thinker can afford to defend in the 21st century. The truth is that today's self- proclaimed guardians of enlightenment and rationality are offshoots of the intellectual poverty of eighteenth century positivism and scienticism, who disfigure philosophy and thought, history and reality. They are the victims of what may be referred to as a sick secularist consciousness.

There are people who really say this stuff to each other, you know. I like the argument of redefining a word out of all meaning as an attempt to claim something doesn't exist.

This feels unfinished. Something's missing...what could it be...

Secularist dogmatism is no less dangerous than its religious sibling. Secularism itself can be, and indeed has been in many historical instances, highly destructive. We should remember that Europe's modern history is scarred with the brutality of secular totalitarianism. Neither the Jacobites, fascists, Nazis or Stalinists were priests or theologians. They were fanatical secularists who worshipped in reason's grand temple and sacrificed hundreds of thousands for the god of progress, fervently vowing to create a new man and a new world on the ruins of the old.

Ah yes, there we go :-) No article of this nature is complete without mentioning Stalin at least once. Normally, though, the argument sounds at least vaguely plausible, even if it turns out to be a bit silly. Stalin, as far as I know, wasn't acting as a result of non-belief in god, he was just your average dictator with access to 20th century technology. He was only using 'reason' in the same way that some Muslim fundamentalists 'reasonably' think that blowing themselves up guarantees them access to paradise. The problem is in the initial assumptions, which we can attack though logic and reason!

Nobody's saying that religion is the only reason for hate and violence, just that it's a major one. Simultaneously accusing 'secularists' of attacking straw-men while saying things like "[c]ommunication, they insist, is only possible within uniformity." is a little ironic, too.

All these words. Why are people so scared of having to back up their ideas? If you want to believe in a fairy in the sky, go right ahead, just don't tell other people they have to think the same thing. If you want to do something that affects other people, you need back it up with evidence and a logical argument - some people call this 'reason', but you can call it rumplebumpkins if you like, it doesn't change what it is. What's wrong with that?

Don't bother reading the whole thing, it's just depressing.

31Oct/060

Dancing Peanuts

Bit of Tuesday happiness to be found over at the always entertaining Mike's Weekly Skeptic Rant, where there's an utterly charming video of the Peanuts gang dancing to Outkast's 'Hey ya'. I really despise that song, so anything that makes me want to listen to the whole thing must be impressive :-)

Tagged as: , No Comments
31Oct/060

Astrotravel

I was listening to Radio 2 this afternoon when the waste of bandwidth that is the weekly astrology segment started. Russell Grant wittered on as usual and I wasn't paying much attention until he mentioned that he'd been asked his advice on whether a person should move to the Orkney Isles. He said:

I had to look up the astrotravel [...] and it's a Leo place is Orkney, and it's a good place to live or work.

Places have star signs now? How does that work? Are there any places - like here, presumably - with a sign that say they're a bad place to live and work? Astrotravel?! Actually, I don't think I want to know. It'll just wind me up. Except I'm intrigued.

31Oct/060

American Smooth

Lynsey and I headed over to Worcester this evening for a lesson in the American Smooth waltz. It's the first of a seven-week course, and was fun, if fast moving. Having some experience in the 'standard' waltz meant we kept up ok, but I felt for the complete beginners. The American Smooth differs in that it's permissible to break the normal ballroom hold, and mixes the elegance of ballroom with more visually interesting latin moves. It has a distinctive look that's hard to describe without using the word 'smooth'. I imagine we'll eventually be taught a full routine. Good fun - I'm looking forward to next week!

Tagged as: , No Comments
30Oct/061

24 Series Four

I started watching the DVD-set of 24's fourth series the week I moved into my flat, which means it's taken almost 12 months to reach the end. I like watching one episode per week, but did sometimes forget :-) I really enjoyed it, though. It's difficult to say anything about the story without giving things away, but it did a reasonable job of maintaining a coherent plot throughout, and avoided the standard formula of simply ascending bad-guy hierarchies. As ever they created some very tense scenes, and it being 24 there was no predicting who would survive. There were a couple of lines that made me wince - one government official seemed to be Dale Arden in disguise - but on the whole it was well written with enough unexpected twists that I couldn't see what was coming. One particular moment was such a surprise that I sat there with my mouth open for about ten seconds, and I like it when something gets me like that. There were the usual insane uses of computer technology and blatant product placements - "they're trying to hack into our network in a massive attack, but the new Cisco firewall is coping!" - but that's all part of the charm :-)

The final disc in the set contained a large number of deleted or extended scenes, which are fun to watch. There was at least one character whose resolution was cut from the final show but included here, and it's also interesting to see the little padding-stories that didn't make it. There's also one scene in which Jack uses the f-word! I was quite shocked - Jack doesn't swear! The only real annoyance with the box-set was the unskippable, minute-long anti-piracy trailer that played every time I inserted a disc. I wouldn't mind if it were just on the first, or something, but twenty-four times gets annoying. Especially since I bought the damn thing, and don't need lecturing in the rights and wrongs of theft.

After four series it's easy to get blasé over the achievement of constructing a show in which something interesting happens every minute of a day (less advert breaks :-) ), but even with the flaws it's still very impressive. Definitely worth watching if you're a fan.

Tagged as: , , 1 Comment
28Oct/061

Cold shower needed

I just watched Mark and Karen's Paso Doble on Strictly Come Dancing. Back after I've had a lie down.

Update: 30 seconds of low quality realplayer footage here. Hopefully there'll be a youtube version before long.

Update 2: There we go. Long clip embedded after the break.

28Oct/061

NBC refuse to broadcast a film trailer containing criticism of President Bush

I like country music when it's not too depressing, and The Dixie Chicks are good fun in this regard. They're in the news today after NBC refused to screen a trailer for their documentary, which follows the few years after they were abruptly launched into politics when lead singer Natalie Maines, during a break at a 2003 London concert, said:

Just so you know, we're ashamed the President of the United States is from Texas.

The US right-wing press went nuts. I may think it's a weird thing to say - how does it make sense to take pride in / be ashamed of somebody else being born in the same arbitrary land area as you? It's like being proud of sharing a birthday - but it was apparently off-the-cuff and certainly pales in comparison to the insanity of the reaction. Wikipedia's good write-up says:

The remark sparked intense criticism from many Americans, on three grounds: that Maines shouldn't be criticizing the nation's head of state while on foreign soil; that Maines shouldn't be criticizing the military's commander-in-chief while the country was on the verge of war; and (from a business standpoint) that Maines shouldn't be making political statements that would offend the Dixie Chicks' culturally conservative audience base.

Which is all crap, if you ask me. The first two are just ridiculous, and the third is funny. I particularly like it when lay-people pretend they have any interest in business decisions. It's like mobile phone mast campaigners claiming they're not NIMBY-ing, just trying to tell Orange that they think it would be a better business decision to place it somewhere else (a frequent response after somebody asks them to provide any evidence to back up their health claims). Who do they think believes them for even for a moment?

Many radio stations refused to play their music - one arranged for its listeners to donate their cds to be crushed by a bulldozer - and the band received death threats. Aside from the craziness that this can all result from something fairly innocuous - doesn't Jon Stewart say worse every night? - it's at least an interesting story. The new documentary, Shut up and Sing, has the following trailer:

and US tv-channel NBC refused to show it on the grounds that it's 'disparaging to President Bush'. I assume this channel is happy to screen political ads that personally attack senators etc. I wonder whether the real reason is right-wing bias or fear of a backlash. I'm sure there are crazies on the left, but the ultra-nationalism that goes seems to go hand-in-hand with the modern Republican Party is appalling. Gotta hope the Democrats have some success in next week's midterm elections.

Natalie Mains said to the Telegraph earlier this year:

The entire country may disagree with me, but I don't understand the necessity for patriotism. Why do you have to be a patriot? About what? This land is our land? Why? You can like where you live and like your life, but as for loving the whole country ... I don't see why people care about patriotism.

Doesn't necessarily follow from the 2003 comment, but I like the sentiment :-) I don't know whether the documentary will make it over here, but it looks worth catching.

28Oct/060

Strictly Tickets

Strictly Tickets

My application was successful - hooray! They say 'Smart/glamorous dress only - no jeans!'. Hmmm. Had better borrow some suit trousers I guess.

Filed under: General No Comments
27Oct/062

Paso Doble

After nagging my teacher for a long time, we started learning the Paso Doble tonight. It's the spanish dance in which the man represents a matador and the woman a cape. In theory it looks like this:

Ours doesn't look like that :-) But it does involve stamping, and is excellent fun. Most other people in our group looked rather nervous when the teacher announced what we were doing, but I think they all enjoyed it in the end. They did make me wear somebody's coat as a cape as punishment, however, which was ok with me - it swooped!

I think I could wangle a cape and a hat if I got good enough at the Paso Doble. This is in fact my ultimate goal. Any excuse to wear a cape and a hat.