Maths vs Logic


November 20th, 2004 - 14:43 | 1 comment

A1 is a circle drawn about centre M. A2 is an arc with centre O. The drawing is not in any way to scale!

a) - Find the area of triangle OCD

Splitting the triangle into two right-angled triangles:
Height^2 = (17^2) - (15^2) = 64; so height = 8

Area = 0.5 * base * height
Area = 0.5 * 15 * 8 = 60

Therefore the area of the entire triangle is 60 * 2 = 120

b) - Find the angle COD in radians

Area = 0.5absinC
120 = 0.5 * 17 * 17 * sinC
sinC = 120 / (0.5 * 17 * 17)
sinC = 0.8304
C = 0.9799 rad

c) - Find the area of the shaded region R

Area of sector O - C - A2 - D - O = 0.5 * radius^2 * OCD
Area = 0.5 * 17^2 * 0.9799rad
Area = 141.5956

Area of semicircle A1 = 0.5 * pi * 15^2
Area = 353.4291

So, area of R = 353.4291 - 141.5956 = 211.83

———————————————————

Except that answer is wrong.

This question is in my Pure 1 maths textbook, and I was figuring it out yesterday. I kept getting the wrong answer and couldn’t understand why. Eventually Mum and I worked out that, in part b, sinC has 2 answers between 0 and 180 (or pi, if you prefer), and I got the wrong one. Had I used trig on the right-angled triangle to find half of OCD, like they did in the textbook explanation, I’d have come up with the correct answer. I didn’t, though. It’s quite annoying in that I didn’t actually do anything mathematically wrong; the only way I could realise something was wrong would be to think of the angle in degrees and then to realise that it would be 56deg. Were it 56deg then it would be nearly an equilateral triangle, which it isn’t. So it’s more of a logic thing than a mathematical one. There’s just no chance I’d realise this in an exam situation, though.

Can anyone think of any other reason I could have spotted my mistake?

-----

One Response to “Maths vs Logic” 

  1. Gravatar Icon 1 Simon 

    Not really, other than becoming more aware of what different radian values mean. 60deg for instance is pi/3 rads which is close to 1. This should then trip the logic failure detector you already described. Again, based on a base length of 30 and a height of 8 you are looking at a very squashed triangle so you want more than 90 deg, which is more than pi/2 rad which is close to 1.5.

    As with all things, there is no substitute for experience. You won’t make this mistake again, though the universe will usually force you to make another mistake while you focus on avoiding this one :(

-----

Leave a Reply

Commenting Policy: Thoughts, observations, argument, debate and all other conversational wonderments are encouraged, but personal attacks or general trolling will result in your comment being deleted and your account/IP banned. If you're nice, however, you get strawberries.

co.mments image Track with co.mments



(comments may take ~20 seconds to process due to anti-spam pixies)