Comments on: Protection Or Lack Thereof http://wongablog.co.uk/2004/07/21/protection-or-lack-thereof/ like balloons, only with dancing Sun, 12 Oct 2008 00:39:57 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: Nodster http://wongablog.co.uk/2004/07/21/protection-or-lack-thereof/#comment-945 Nodster Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://wongablog.djcounsell.org/?p=413#comment-945 its usually pretty good - ibm made us have it at one point - but it just p'd me right off. I think it checks the authenticity of the installations - microsoft embed fields in to ensure its clearly identifiable as a critical patch not some patch to install a load of trojans masquerading as a service pack. but your the msc proffesional u tell us ;) hehehe ;) its usually pretty good - ibm made us have it at one point - but it just p’d me right off. I think it checks the authenticity of the installations - microsoft embed fields in to ensure its clearly identifiable as a critical patch not some patch to install a load of trojans masquerading as a service pack. but your the msc proffesional u tell us ;) hehehe ;)

]]> By: Ed http://wongablog.co.uk/2004/07/21/protection-or-lack-thereof/#comment-946 Ed Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://wongablog.djcounsell.org/?p=413#comment-946 the patches should get checked by the windows updater anyway since they should be checksummed and signed. --- the patches should get checked by the windows updater anyway since they should be checksummed and signed.

—

]]>