<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Email Disconnections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wongablog.co.uk/2004/04/06/email-disconnections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wongablog.co.uk/2004/04/06/email-disconnections/</link>
	<description>like balloons, only with dancing</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 02:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Edward</title>
		<link>http://wongablog.co.uk/2004/04/06/email-disconnections/#comment-586</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wongablog.djcounsell.org/?p=311#comment-586</guid>
		<description>X-Message-Info: O[4

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ is Spam Assassin running on their mail servers????
And if so, is it breaking????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>X-Message-Info: O[4</p>
<p>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ is Spam Assassin running on their mail servers????<br />
And if so, is it breaking????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://wongablog.co.uk/2004/04/06/email-disconnections/#comment-587</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wongablog.djcounsell.org/?p=311#comment-587</guid>
		<description>Is X-Message-Info a SpamAssassin header? I'm trying to find out about it, but not having much luck atm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is X-Message-Info a SpamAssassin header? I&#8217;m trying to find out about it, but not having much luck atm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward</title>
		<link>http://wongablog.co.uk/2004/04/06/email-disconnections/#comment-588</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wongablog.djcounsell.org/?p=311#comment-588</guid>
		<description>Well I thought that it was since I'm running NAV, and on my SpamAssassin (I am pretty sure it is SapmAssassin) protected emails, I get loads of extra headers

From - Sun Apr 04 14:38:35 2004
X-UIDL: UID1990-1070046922
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
Return-path:
Delivery-date: Sun, 04 Apr 2004 06:38:14 -0700
Received: from [216.148.213.132] (helo=smtp.mailix.net)
	by mx.mailix.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24-GA)
	id 1BA7pE-0003l2-QN
	for email@email.email; Sun, 04 Apr 2004 06:38:12 -0700
Received: from [212.56.110.225] (helo=edbateman.com)
	by smtp.mailix.net with asmtp (Exim 4.24-H)
	id 1BA7p6-00064A-E3
	for email; Sun, 04 Apr 2004 06:38:04 -0700
Message-ID:
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2004 14:37:40 +0100
From: emailemail
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:  email@email.email
X-uvscan-result: clean (1BA7p6-00064A-E3)
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: email@email.email
Subject: (no subject)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on
	westvirginia.backend
X-Spam-Report:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.61
X-Spam-Level:
X-SA-Exim-Version: 3.1 (built Thu Oct 23 13:26:47 PDT 2003)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
X-uvscan-result: clean (1BA7pE-0003l2-QN)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I thought that it was since I&#8217;m running NAV, and on my SpamAssassin (I am pretty sure it is SapmAssassin) protected emails, I get loads of extra headers</p>
<p>From - Sun Apr 04 14:38:35 2004<br />
X-UIDL: UID1990-1070046922<br />
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001<br />
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000<br />
Return-path:<br />
Delivery-date: Sun, 04 Apr 2004 06:38:14 -0700<br />
Received: from [216.148.213.132] (helo=smtp.mailix.net)<br />
	by mx.mailix.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24-GA)<br />
	id 1BA7pE-0003l2-QN<br />
	for <a href="mailto:email@email.email">email@email.email</a>; Sun, 04 Apr 2004 06:38:12 -0700<br />
Received: from [212.56.110.225] (helo=edbateman.com)<br />
	by smtp.mailix.net with asmtp (Exim 4.24-H)<br />
	id 1BA7p6-00064A-E3<br />
	for email; Sun, 04 Apr 2004 06:38:04 -0700<br />
Message-ID:<br />
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2004 14:37:40 +0100<br />
From: emailemail<br />
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207)<br />
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en<br />
MIME-Version: 1.0<br />
To:  <a href="mailto:email@email.email">email@email.email</a><br />
X-uvscan-result: clean (1BA7p6-00064A-E3)<br />
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: <a href="mailto:email@email.email">email@email.email</a><br />
Subject: (no subject)<br />
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed<br />
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit<br />
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on<br />
	westvirginia.backend<br />
X-Spam-Report:<br />
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.61<br />
X-Spam-Level:<br />
X-SA-Exim-Version: 3.1 (built Thu Oct 23 13:26:47 PDT 2003)<br />
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes<br />
X-uvscan-result: clean (1BA7pE-0003l2-QN)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward</title>
		<link>http://wongablog.co.uk/2004/04/06/email-disconnections/#comment-589</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wongablog.djcounsell.org/?p=311#comment-589</guid>
		<description>(my emails are also virus scanned too at the mail server!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(my emails are also virus scanned too at the mail server!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward</title>
		<link>http://wongablog.co.uk/2004/04/06/email-disconnections/#comment-590</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wongablog.djcounsell.org/?p=311#comment-590</guid>
		<description>Actually, I want to change my mind. (sorry)
SpamAssassin adds extra fields in, but it doesn't mention that it adds the X-Message-Info. I think that some servers, when sending emails on copy the Message-Info old message info to a new X-Message-Info, and then replace the Message-Info.
I will do a search through all my emails and see if any have these headers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I want to change my mind. (sorry)<br />
SpamAssassin adds extra fields in, but it doesn&#8217;t mention that it adds the X-Message-Info. I think that some servers, when sending emails on copy the Message-Info old message info to a new X-Message-Info, and then replace the Message-Info.<br />
I will do a search through all my emails and see if any have these headers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward</title>
		<link>http://wongablog.co.uk/2004/04/06/email-disconnections/#comment-591</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wongablog.djcounsell.org/?p=311#comment-591</guid>
		<description>After mucho searching on the web and emails, I've concluded that I'm at a loss.
The only emails that have those headers are from hotmail emails, and the email headers continue on after the X-Message-Info headers.
Perhaps you might want to:
a) check whether the mail.zp.ua is a blacklisted web server
b) check what Tiscali thinks about the problem?

It might be a: 'It is a feature, not a bug'.
Sorry to have been no more help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After mucho searching on the web and emails, I&#8217;ve concluded that I&#8217;m at a loss.<br />
The only emails that have those headers are from hotmail emails, and the email headers continue on after the X-Message-Info headers.<br />
Perhaps you might want to:<br />
a) check whether the mail.zp.ua is a blacklisted web server<br />
b) check what Tiscali thinks about the problem?</p>
<p>It might be a: &#8216;It is a feature, not a bug&#8217;.<br />
Sorry to have been no more help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://wongablog.co.uk/2004/04/06/email-disconnections/#comment-592</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wongablog.djcounsell.org/?p=311#comment-592</guid>
		<description>No problem, thanks very much for looking! I'll do some investigating of the IP etc as you suggest</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No problem, thanks very much for looking! I&#8217;ll do some investigating of the IP etc as you suggest</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bert</title>
		<link>http://wongablog.co.uk/2004/04/06/email-disconnections/#comment-593</link>
		<dc:creator>Bert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wongablog.djcounsell.org/?p=311#comment-593</guid>
		<description>I'm not sure if there are legitimate uses of X-Message-Info, but the ones you quote are consistent with certain spam software.

The clipped message is in all likelyhood also caused by the spamware. My hypothesis is that they use an unreliable protocol to talk to the (virus/worm) infected machine, and therefore only manage to send parts of the spam out when the network connection of the victim in between gets overloaded.


---</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure if there are legitimate uses of X-Message-Info, but the ones you quote are consistent with certain spam software.</p>
<p>The clipped message is in all likelyhood also caused by the spamware. My hypothesis is that they use an unreliable protocol to talk to the (virus/worm) infected machine, and therefore only manage to send parts of the spam out when the network connection of the victim in between gets overloaded.</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
