<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tiredness &#038; TFT Madness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wongablog.co.uk/2004/02/13/tiredness-tft-madness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wongablog.co.uk/2004/02/13/tiredness-tft-madness/</link>
	<description>like balloons, only with dancing</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://wongablog.co.uk/2004/02/13/tiredness-tft-madness/#comment-441</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wongablog.djcounsell.org/?p=250#comment-441</guid>
		<description>was it next to the VGA socket?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>was it next to the VGA socket?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward</title>
		<link>http://wongablog.co.uk/2004/02/13/tiredness-tft-madness/#comment-442</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wongablog.djcounsell.org/?p=250#comment-442</guid>
		<description>on the edge?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>on the edge?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://wongablog.co.uk/2004/02/13/tiredness-tft-madness/#comment-443</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wongablog.djcounsell.org/?p=250#comment-443</guid>
		<description>Nope and nope</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope and nope</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://wongablog.co.uk/2004/02/13/tiredness-tft-madness/#comment-444</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wongablog.djcounsell.org/?p=250#comment-444</guid>
		<description>Did you have to say "open sesame seed bun"? Is it powered by a ballistic duck?

Or more seriously, was it situated near a headphone jack, or was it dismissed as this? On some monitors the is a raised bit at the back and on the bottom edge there is the jack. Horrors of horrors, it wasn't on the front was it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you have to say &#8220;open sesame seed bun&#8221;? Is it powered by a ballistic duck?</p>
<p>Or more seriously, was it situated near a headphone jack, or was it dismissed as this? On some monitors the is a raised bit at the back and on the bottom edge there is the jack. Horrors of horrors, it wasn&#8217;t on the front was it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://wongablog.co.uk/2004/02/13/tiredness-tft-madness/#comment-445</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wongablog.djcounsell.org/?p=250#comment-445</guid>
		<description>Sadly there was no secret code phrase, though I would suggest that to prospective monitor designers as a good strategy.

Nope, nowhere near the jack, or the front. It wasn't on the monitor itself at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly there was no secret code phrase, though I would suggest that to prospective monitor designers as a good strategy.</p>
<p>Nope, nowhere near the jack, or the front. It wasn&#8217;t on the monitor itself at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://wongablog.co.uk/2004/02/13/tiredness-tft-madness/#comment-446</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wongablog.djcounsell.org/?p=250#comment-446</guid>
		<description>if not on the monitor that leaves the stand or remote power. Sadly, the closest anyone has got to remote power was when tesla managed to get everyones light bulb in a town to turn on at once...if that was even true. If its on the stand would all those holes on the metal plate be some kind of interface to pass the power up through? I still find it hard to believe that you could miss the jack though... I suppose there is the possibility that the power was conducted up the supplied vga cable, but then why would you have the power cable? unless it plugged into something on one end or other of the vga cable...its too weird.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if not on the monitor that leaves the stand or remote power. Sadly, the closest anyone has got to remote power was when tesla managed to get everyones light bulb in a town to turn on at once&#8230;if that was even true. If its on the stand would all those holes on the metal plate be some kind of interface to pass the power up through? I still find it hard to believe that you could miss the jack though&#8230; I suppose there is the possibility that the power was conducted up the supplied vga cable, but then why would you have the power cable? unless it plugged into something on one end or other of the vga cable&#8230;its too weird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://wongablog.co.uk/2004/02/13/tiredness-tft-madness/#comment-447</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wongablog.djcounsell.org/?p=250#comment-447</guid>
		<description>You've got it :-) It was a hole on the VGA connector into the back of the PC. I've never seen this on a monitor before!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve got it <img src='http://wongablog.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> It was a hole on the VGA connector into the back of the PC. I&#8217;ve never seen this on a monitor before!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://wongablog.co.uk/2004/02/13/tiredness-tft-madness/#comment-448</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wongablog.djcounsell.org/?p=250#comment-448</guid>
		<description>Totally pointless. I suppose it could tidy things up a bit, but there really are only two kinds of pc set ups. The main type is messy. Cables everywhere. The second is if you have some kind of cool desk set up. Little holes to drop cables down, perhaps have the monitor mounted into something somehow, with the base locked away where no one can see it. If you fall into case one then no amount of weird cable design is going to reduce the mess. If you fall into type two then there is no mess, the existing system already allows for a monitor power cable, and so it all becomes pointless. The only other reason is wear and tear. The more complicated something is the more likely it is to break. The more unique something is the harder it is to replace. High breaking chances combined with uniqueness equals hefty replacement costs.

Or, perhaps I am just paranoid.

Oh, btw, it seems I have temporarilt been able to sneak my site out of Oxford. Try &lt;a href="http://baguetter.homelinux.com:19000" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://baguetter.homelinux.com:19000&lt;/a&gt;


---</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally pointless. I suppose it could tidy things up a bit, but there really are only two kinds of pc set ups. The main type is messy. Cables everywhere. The second is if you have some kind of cool desk set up. Little holes to drop cables down, perhaps have the monitor mounted into something somehow, with the base locked away where no one can see it. If you fall into case one then no amount of weird cable design is going to reduce the mess. If you fall into type two then there is no mess, the existing system already allows for a monitor power cable, and so it all becomes pointless. The only other reason is wear and tear. The more complicated something is the more likely it is to break. The more unique something is the harder it is to replace. High breaking chances combined with uniqueness equals hefty replacement costs.</p>
<p>Or, perhaps I am just paranoid.</p>
<p>Oh, btw, it seems I have temporarilt been able to sneak my site out of Oxford. Try <a href="http://baguetter.homelinux.com:19000" rel="nofollow">http://baguetter.homelinux.com:19000</a></p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
